Posted in Post Index on October 26th, 2009 4:41 am by HC
You could call it a Rush to judgment. Eh, eh?
It was too easy: Some obscure blogger “unearths” some pages of President Obama’s college thesis. A thesis with gems for the haters: Obama hates the Constitution, etc.
The report supposedly originated from Joe Klein of Time.
The author really was an obscure blogger, but one who wrote a satirical post about the thesis, citing Klein’s “discovery.” Rush Limbaugh went on to quote from the supposed thesis on his radio show, believing it was legit. That’s a good satire.
In reality, the joke post, which claimed Klein had gotten his hands on 10 pages of student Obama’s college thesis, was a total hoax and is not true in the least.
However, unlike Balloon Boy, it was not concocted in the hopes of this happening. And some will argue that it duped Rush and others because it’s so realistic.
Rush Limbaugh got punked by a satirical blog purporting to have seen Barack Obama’s college thesis. On a side note, Rush is an interesting name for such a large fella.
Believable or not, Rush was definitely had by the fake thesis.
Supposedly titled “Aristocracy Revisited,” the faux thesis excerpt revealed the president had “doubts” about the “so-called founders” of our great country.
Juicy. Except not true.
Limbaugh discovered halfway through his show that he’d been had, but defended himself by saying, basically, the thesis felt true. That’ll work for his “fans.”
Joe Klein himself even jumped in, calling the report “nonsense” on his blog, and another blogger who thought the Obama thesis hoax was real also apologized.
For a humble post to go from an entry on a humor blog to major media outlet sure seems impressive. Someone ought to write a thesis or commentary on it.